Showing posts with label GMO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GMO. Show all posts

Monday, August 3, 2015

Let’s Keep Our Food Free: Stop the DARK Act


Let’s keep our food free!

Last week, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1599 or what we call the Deny Americans the Right to Know – or DARK – Act.  The DARK Act would deny Americans the right to know whether their food contains genetically modified food ingredients.

We need to stand up for American consumers rights!  This bill would make it effectively impossible for America to enact the same kind of mandatory GMO labeling that exists in 64 other nations, and it would overturn existing GMO labeling laws in states like Vermont, Connecticut and Maine.

Nine out of 10 Americans support mandatory GMO labeling, yet this act would block all states from labeling genetically engineered foods, and it would also make it much harder for the FDA to ever mandate national labeling.

According to a report from Open Secrets, a project of the Center for Responsive Politics, the 275 members of the U.S. House who voted in favor of H.R. 1599 received $29.9 million in contributions from the agribusiness and food industries in the 2014 cycle.

But despite the lobbyist’s best efforts, Congress has long recognized that Americans should be given basic information about their food and trusted to make the right choices for their families.

To ensure the freedom to know what’s in our food we need to let the Senate and President Obama know how serious the American public is about GMO labeling. 

JustLabel It has created a petition to let the Senate and President Obama know howserious we are about GMO labeling (and note we’re not trying to ban GMOs in America, only to label them for those who want the Choice!)

The petition is 86% away from its 200,000-signature goal.   My signature was 176,566; will yours be 175,567?

Here’s to life being delicious and full of choices! 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Californians Pushing Hard for Ballot Initiative to Label GMOs


Wrote an article for the SM Observer on the GMO Ballot Initiative!

 

Label GMOs

 

Californians Pushing Hard for Ballot Initiative to Label GMOs


The demand to label GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) is picking up steam both locally with California being the first state to attempt a ballot initiative requiring the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food through the California Right to Know campaign, and also nationally.   Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are experimental plants and animals that have been genetically engineered in a laboratory with DNA from other plants, animals, bacteria, and viruses. 

Although GMO ingredients (which is also sometimes referred to as GE food (Genetically Engineered food) are found in 80% of packaged foods in the U.S., they have not been proven safe as the long term consequences of GMOs on human beings’ health and environment have not been adequately investigated.  Forty countries, including Australia, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Russia, South Korea, China, Brazil, Mexico, and all of the European Union nations, either have significant restrictions or outright bans on the production of GMOs because they are not considered proven safe. 

GMOs exist for two main reasons: 1) Seed producers modify their seed to make them resistant to their brand of herbicide 2) Seed producers modify plants to contain built-in pesticides.  As of 2010, GMOs constituted 86% of the Corn, 90% of the Canola, 93% of the Soy, and 93% of the Cotton grown in the U.S.  GMO crops are also added to processed foods as oils, sweeteners, and soy proteins and in things like amino acids, aspartame, vitamin C, flavorings (both natural and artificial), maltodextrins and more.  

At this time neither Canada or the United States require the labeling of genetically engineered food.  But that is starting to change with political movements on the state (California Right to Know) and national level (Just Label It).  With three weeks left to collect the necessary 800,000 signatures before the April 22nd deadline, signature gatherers are working furiously to collect signatures in front of Santa Monica foodie staples like the Santa Monica Co-Op and the Farmers Markets.

Because it is a state ballot initiative all signatures must be signed with pen and paper in person only. The actual number to get on the California ballot 504,760 signatures, but signatures can get thrown out for a number of reasons: being illegible, spelling mistakes, wrong county, etc.  Thus California Right to Know’s experts have informed them to figure on getting 800,000 signatures to make sure they have enough that qualify.  Although California has the potential to be the first state to put GMO labeling to a vote it is not in any the only state discussing the issue.  Vermont and Florida are planning on pursuing the 2013 ballot session, with ten other states potentially looking into GMO labeling for the future.   

The main reason for the demand for labeling is that there has been enough independent data to suggest possible health risks.  Given those findings some people don’t want to eat GMOs but are unable to know which foods GMOs are in if they aren’t labeled.  For the Labelers it is a basic consumer right: that given the conflicting data and mistrust in an industry that has been proven to hide negative findings, the American public have the right to know what they’re buying and putting in their and their children’s mouths.

As Right to Know’s website states, “What’s the issue? If GMOs are so great, why not advertise them?  Why does the industry that profits from them fight labeling so vehemently and put so many of their resources into keeping their presence in our foods a secret?  Why are corporate rights continually given precedence over consumer rights?”

Nationally, the FDA’s position on GMOS is that they are unaware of any risks with GMOs and that GMOs are “substantially equivalent” to their non-GMO counterparts.  Just Label It is a coalition of more than 500 organizations working together at the federal level for mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food.  Over one million people have signed the online petition contacting the FDA and telling them United States citizens have a right to know what's in their food.  But in recent days, those million plus collective signatures, more than any other petition submitted to the FDA in its history, that were collected in less than 180 days by Just Label It, will only be counted as 394 because of an FDA rule that states that if thousand and thousands of people sign a single petition or submit the same form letter they are only counted as one collective signature. 

Now in the world of GMOs the player who has the most to lose by a label mandate is Monsanto, the agricultural multinational at the forefront of the GMO world. 

And who is the senior adviser for the FDA?  Michael Taylor, former vice president and lobbyist for Monsanto.  More than 433,000 have signed the petition (on signon.org, a petition signing tool created by Moveon.org) urging President Barack Obama to reconsider his 2009 appointment of Taylor who, to many, represents the epitome of the revolving door between industry executives (Monsanto) and regulatory agency executives (the FDA).  The petition demanding the removal of Taylor from the FDA notes: “Taylor is the same person who as a high-ranking official at the FDA in the 1990s promoted allowing genetically modified organisms into the U.S. food supply without undergoing a single test to determine their safety or risks. This is a travesty.”

Until GMO labeling is a right in both California and the United States Americans can educate themselves through the Non-GMO Project.  The Non-GMO Project is a non-profit organization committed to preserving and building sources of Non-GMO products and educating consumers.  Their website offers a database of brands and products that have been verified by the Non-GMO Project as GMO free.  They can also chose to purchase organic food as the USDA certification states that “the use of genetically engineered organisms and their products are prohibited at any stage in organic production processing or handling.”

That is until the right that over forty countries around the world already have becomes a reality in both the state of California and the United States at large.  

Kat Thomas is a food writer in Santa Monica.   To find out more about her you can check out: edibleskinny.com

Monday, June 18, 2012

Robyn O'Brien GMO TED Talk

A great methodical TED talk by Robyn O'Brien about why you should learn more about the world of GMOs and demand that we label our foods.






Robyn O'Brien is a former Wall Street food industry analyst, Robyn brings insight, compassion and detailed analysis to her research into the impact that the global food system is having on the health of our children. She founded [www.allergykids.com|http://www.allergykids.com/] and was named by Forbes as one of "20 Inspiring Women to Follow on Twitter." The New York Times has passionately described her as "Food's Erin Brockovich."

Thursday, March 29, 2012

1 Million Voices (or Maybe Just 394)

Just Label It

Last week Just Label It announced they had hit a million comments with their online petition to the FDA demanding the need for GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) labeling. And how did the FDA respond? By saying there was actually only 394 comments.

Those million plus collective signatures, more than any other petition submitted to the FDA in its history, that were collected in less than 180 days by Just Label It's more than 500 organizations, will only be counted as 394 because of an FDA rule that states that if thousand and thousands of people sign a single petition or submit the same form letter they are only counted as one collective signature.
Now in the world of GMOs and GE (Genetically Engineered) food the player who has the most to lose by a label mandate is Monsanto, the agricultural multinational at the forefront of the GMO world.

And who is the senior adviser for the FDA?

Michael Taylor, former vice president and lobbyist for Monsanto. And as the online petition to oust Michael Taylor from the FDA notes: “Taylor is the same person who as a high-ranking official at the FDA in the 1990s promoted allowing genetically modified organisms into the U.S. food supply without undergoing a single test to determine their safety or risks. This is a travesty.” (Something that 40 countries, including Australia, Japan, China, Brazil, Mexico, and all of the European Union nations, either have significant restrictions or outright bans on the production of because they are not considered proven safe.)

So it's no wonder that one million equals 394.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

The Bad Acronyms: Stopping GEs

Hey Guys! Want to sign a petition? The peeps over at Food and Water Watch are trying to stop Monsanto's GE Sweet Corn!

Monsanto's GE (that's Genetically Engineered not the light bulb company. GE’s other aliases include GMO, aka Genetically Modified Organism) sweet corn is approved and could be on your plate next year. This GE sweet corn, the first Monsanto crop designed to be consumed by people, is genetically engineered to produce pesticides and resist herbicides.

Food & Water Watch will be delivering these petitions signatures to the top ten largest grocery store chains in the U.S. to let them know consumers won't buy Monsanto's GE sweet corn.
So why should you be concerned about Monsanto's Genetically Engineered Sweet Corn?
1) This is the first GE crop that Monsanto is marketing for direct human consumption.
2) It will not be labeled.
3) It hasn't been tested for human safety.

Monsanto's sweet corn variety flew through the approval process because it combines two genetically engineered traits that were approved in 2005 and 2008. The USDA does no independent testing of GE crops, and the "stacked" combination of these traits for herbicide resistance and pesticide production has never been through a safety evaluation of any kind.

These traits have never been engineered into a food that will be consumed directly by people. Most of the GE corn that is currently grown is eaten by animals or processed into corn syrup, corn oil and other corn ingredients that show up in processed food. Monsanto's aiming to have their new GE sweet corn grown on 250,000 acres next year (roughly 40% of the sweet corn market). If this scares you take action now to make sure this corn isn't sold at your local grocery store (especially since you can do it on the internet now… remember when you had to sign a petition in person).

If the approval of Monsanto's sweet corn isn't bad enough, genetically engineered crops are not required to be labeled (like they are in Europe). We have no way of knowing if a food has been genetically engineered or contains GE ingredients.

They (and I) believe labeling should be required so that people can choose whether or not they want to eat GE foods. Unfortunately, GE sweet corn will not be labeled and it doesn't look any different from regular sweet corn.

Help make sure GE sweet corn is not sold by signing their petition to grocery stores. Food and Water Watch will be delivering this petition to the top ten grocery store chains in the country in an attempt to stop GE sweet corn from reaching our plates.

Sign the petition to grocery stores today: http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=8405